Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Courtesy Corner

The lack of common courtesy that I witness and experience on a daily basis is astounding. I think its safe to say that the majority of the general public has a complete lack of othersmindedness (this probably isn't really a word but you know what I mean by it). Allow me to choose the simple topic of courtesy out and about on the roadways. When driving on the freeway it is not necessary to be in the far left lane if you are driving the same speed as the cars in the middle or the right lane. My understanding is that the left lane is for faster traffic, if you are going the same speed as the car next to you, you are not faster traffic and therefore should not be in the left lane. I've heard it said that if you are going the speed limit or even slightly over it which is common practice, you should not feel compelled to move out of the way of vehicles that want to go faster than you. My response to this is that basically this argument breaks down to something like "I should be able to drive as fast as i'm comfortable with and if other people don't like it they can go around me" and yet by having that attitude and driving that way you are making a case against that argument because you won't allow others to adopt the same practice. They would like to drive as fast as they are comfortable with and are being prevented by your stubbornness. It's just rude, I say if some one wants to drive faster than you, let them go by, changing lanes to get out of their path is really not that big of a deal.
Next, I would like to target semi-trucks, dump trucks, junky vehicles that can't go fast, and people who for some strange reason are afraid to get remotely close to the speed limit. We are all taught that the right lane is for slower traffic, but I am going to make a revolutionary statement here and say that slow people should drive in the middle lane. Here's why. Traffic is primarily caused by people merging on and off of the freeway therefore anything that potentially slows down the merging process is going to cause traffic. In Riverside particularly a lot of the onramp's don't give you much time to merge onto the 91 freeway. This being the case a large truck or something that is going 50-60mph rather than 65-80 can seriously get in the way when attempting to merge. If these slow moving vehicles had any sort of dexterity that would enable them to move quickly to accomodate cars merging in then things would be fine, but they of course don't. Therefore, if these vehicles were in the middle lane they would be completely out of the way of the cars that are getting on and off the freeway. If you happen to be responsible for a slow moving vehicle I recommend you try using the middle lane, also try speeding it up a little bit, just try it. I promise you won't die and hey, you may even like it, you may even get to where you are going on time!
Lastly I would like to point out a lack of courtesy in pedestrians. I understand full well the purpose of crosswalks but it seems to be that pedestrians using them seem to lose their understanding of why the intersection at which they are crossing has a crosswalk to begin with. Allow me to remind them, the crosswalk is needed because at that particular place a lot of cars want to go in all directions thus it is necessary to stop them in order for any pedestrians to get across the street. That's fine and dandy but when a pedestrian presses the button, waits a little bit, then steps off the curb when told to walk they seem to instantaneously develop a mentality that is telling them the whole world has just been paused so that they can perform an extraordinary show of walking across the street. Due to most people's desire to have their 15 minutes of fame, they really don't want to squander this spotlight they've been given, thus they draw out this time as long as possible. What they fail to realize is that some cars are allowed to go as soon as the pedestrians are out of the way which means, as the performance of walking is going on, others must sit waiting with whatever patience they can muster. Let me wrap it up with this, if you use a walker to get around or are blind by all means take the full time all the way up until the hand becomes solid red to cross the street. Everyone else, haul your butt across there at the double quick because we all have somewhere we need to be and a performance of you walking across the street is not worth the admission to the show. Remember people, we live in California, this is a fast paced place and it's never gonna change, if you can hack it, I hear there are cheap houses in South Dakota.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

As a mom toting 2 kids who often uses crosswalks (at least once everyday to get to either the gym or the store) - I appreciate those stopping at the light before their tires are actually in the crosswalk and I walk quickly or jog to show my appreciation. I also appreciate those who choose to stop where there is no light to let me cross. I show the same "quick" appreciation. I do get very annoyed when that same appreciation is not shown to me when I am the driver stopping at the crosswalk. And when people look at me and choose to speed up so that I won't cross in front of them - it is then that I wish I flipped people off. (Especially if I see a carseat in their car .. those are the ones who should always stop for a mom with kids because they should understand the time constraints and difficulty of toting children around)
Allison

MillerTime said...

I'll leave it up to you, but you could be justified in flipping people off in that situation. Following the rule of treat others how you want to be treated, they obviously want to be treated rudely so they would probably appreciate it. Although it might become problematic if your two year old decided to mimic the behavior and started flipping off cars as they drive by.

Anonymous said...

I agree with most of your post, but I would say that driving the speed limit is not showing a lack of courtesy. (Although I do think you should get out of the way, if possible.) I also think that people who drive recklessly fast or weave all over the freeway to go where they want, when they want are the ones who are being uncourteous!

Anonymous said...

I agree some of the people in the cross walk seem to slow down and take a very long time to get across. I understand if people are doing the best they can, but when it is intentional slowing I can become very annoyed.

T-Dub said...

I too am anoyed by those drivers that think they have to be in the fast lane. When there are not many cars at all, it is not too bad, because I can go around them. However, many drivers tend to move into the left lane and go the same speed as the car next to them and form a barricade for all of us who would like to go faster.
I think there are two kinds of inconsiderate drivers on the rode. First are the kind that can't really think and drive at the same time. They are stuck the mentality they had when they first learned to drive. These people just aren't able to keep up with the times.
Second are the kind that are truly and purposefully inconsiderate. They may see you coming quickly in their rear view mirror, but they want to get over first-so they do. This forces you to slam on your brakes so that you can wait 10 seconds for them to accelerate back to the speed you were traveling (if you're able to get back up there).
It's because of these people that I drive the way I do. If everyone was courteous and drove appropriately, then I wouldn't feel any need to change lanes as often as I do. I know that there are some people who drive pretty recklessly, but I don't think that's me. I don't just cut people off and go wherever, whenever I please. If there is an opening, I'll take it. If there's not, I don't force it. I just about always use my blinker so that the people know I'm getting in front of them. So, even though I weave, I don't feel that I drive recklessly. Someone may think otherwise, and you're entitled to your opinion.
We should race to see who's right. jk

Anonymous said...

Seems like you have a pet peeve about traffic. I thought I'd give you my pet peeve. It's people who use the phrase, "Sorry about that," which is a LOT of people. You drive half an hour to a store to buy something in response to an ad in the paper. The clerk tells you that they don't have any of that item and quickly says, "Sorry about that." You spend a couple of hours doing something for work and then find out the time was wasted because the forms were old. The person in charge says, "Sorry about that." NO THEY'RE NOT SORRY! You can tell it by their lack of concern and the ease with which the cliche slips off their tongue. What they really mean is, "Don't bother me." I realize there is probably nothing they can do about the situation, but the courtesy of a sincere apology goes a long way. A sincere apology has an empathetic tone, some facial expression that shows the person understands why you are annoyed, and at least a few words that convey that they genuinely feel bad that you have been inconvenienced: "I am so sorry that you had to drive all the way over here. Perhaps we could call you when the shipment arrives so that you won't have to make another unnecessary trip." There are many appropriate and meaningful things that could be said--things that would garner some good will. A glib, "Sorry about that," is not one of them. Next time you hear this phrase, just stop and asky yourself if you really believe it.
--Roxann

Anonymous said...

I am frustrated by the drivers who seem to be oblivious to the fact there are other people on the road and when you remind them they get annoyed. The people who intentionally take their sweet time crossing the crosswalk are also on the top of my list of annoying traffic issues.
mike from bc